ATLVS vs. Procore

ATLVS Technologies vs. Procore: production timelines vs. construction timelines.

Procore was built for 18-month build cycles with deep BIM, drawings, and procurement integration. Live-event production runs the same workflow primitives but on 4–12 week clocks with different vendors and different vocabulary. The Procore feature set is right; the velocity isn't.

Bottom line

If you build buildings, Procore. If you build shows that look like buildings (festivals, immersive, scenic, large activations), ATLVS — same primitives, production-velocity.

Feature Comparison.

Side by side, without the marketing math.

Feature	ATLVS	Procore
RFIs with ball-in-court routing
Submittals with reviewer workflow
Daily logs (weather + manpower + photos)
Punch lists with photo evidence
Change orders + pay applications
BIM / CAD / Revit integrations
Public stakeholder portals (artist/sponsor/guest)
Offline gate scan
Event guides (KBYG) CMS
Per-org pricing

Where We Win.

Production velocity

Show-day urgency on the same workflow primitives. RFIs that close in 24 hours, not 14 days.

Live-event surface area

Stage plots, artist riders, gate scan, vendor COIs, KBYG — none of which Procore models.

When Procore Wins.

We're not the answer to every problem. These are the cases where they're the right call.

Construction-led projects with BIM, drawing markups, and 12+ month timelines.
Permanent-build venues where the build IS the deliverable.

Migration Path.

For teams moving from Procore.

Procore RFI/submittal exports map directly to our primitives
Daily logs port over; weather and manpower fields one-to-one
Most build-shop teams move scenic/fabrication to ATLVS, keep Procore for venue-build projects

Read the long-form on Procore alternatives →

vs. Procore · FAQ

Are you a Procore replacement?

For event-production timelines, yes. For permanent construction, no.

ATLVS Is Open.

Free forever for small teams. Migrate when you're ready.