ATLVS vs. Bizzabo

ATLVS Technologies vs. Bizzabo: production-grade vs. hybrid-event platform.

Bizzabo earned its place in the hybrid-conference category. For a producer building festivals, immersive activations, or running a touring crew, the platform optimizes for an audience experience layer — not for the production team behind it.

Bottom line

Bizzabo for the audience side of a hybrid conference. ATLVS for the production side of any live event.

Feature Comparison.

Side by side, without the marketing math.

Feature	ATLVS	Bizzabo
Hybrid event streaming
Branded event apps for attendees	Via portals
Production advancing (riders, plots)
RFIs · submittals · punch lists
Offline gate scan		Limited
Stripe Connect vendor payouts
Per-org pricing (not per-registration)
Stakeholder portals beyond attendees

Where We Win.

Producers, not attendees

We optimize the workflow of the team running the event. Bizzabo optimizes the experience of attending it.

Production primitives ship native

Stage plots, riders, COIs, scanning — first-class. Bizzabo's plug-ins don't cover this.

When Bizzabo Wins.

We're not the answer to every problem. These are the cases where they're the right call.

Hybrid conferences with deep streaming + registration + sponsorship.
You need 1st-party attendee analytics tied into your marketing automation.

Migration Path.

For teams moving from Bizzabo.

Export Bizzabo session list → maps to ROS + advancing
Sponsor records port to ATLVS sponsorship + portal access
Most teams run both: Bizzabo for the attendee app, ATLVS for production

Read the long-form on Bizzabo alternatives →

vs. Bizzabo · FAQ

Can we keep using Bizzabo for our hybrid conference?

Yes — most teams do. Webhooks let you sync session changes between the two.

ATLVS Is Open.

Free forever for small teams. Migrate when you're ready.